Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Midterm Elections
in the US:
Audacity, More
Audacity, and Always Audacity
By Ben Tanosborn
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 15, 2010
In these recent elections we may
have finally come to realize that political America resembles more the state
of Wisconsin than it does the state of Vermont; and that the political left
will have absolutely no place in American politics until the country turns
to ashes, after being set ablaze by a Tweedledee-Tweedledum political system
run amuck by corrupt leadership bent on maintaining the all-powerful
capitalist-militarist elite in power. By then, there will be little
anyone can do to resurrect the American nation, or even impose justice on
the arsonists who incinerated it. I don’t believe to have come
across the word “audacity,” whether written or spoken, as often as I have in
the last few days, at the aftermath of the Midterm Elections. And all
voices do seem to come from the not-so-numerous progressives in America; in
every instance referring to President Barack Obama… and his lack of spine:
audacity, that is! Could it be that invertebrate Obama was warned
when he was elected as America’s torch-bearer for change in 2008 of that
other “man for change” during that long ago forgotten French Revolution, one
by the name of Georges Jacques Danton? Danton, who is
considered to be by many historians the key individual in the overthrow of
the monarchy and the establishment of the First French Republic, in a speech
before the French National Assembly in 1792 proclaimed his revolutionary
stance: “Audacity, more audacity and always audacity.” But, to
America’s misfortune, the learned and curious American president also
quickly found out that this Monsieur Danton was guillotined two years later!
Hum… it probably occurred to our president that audacity might be overrated;
so why not follow a middle-of-the-road course, be conciliatory in tone while
pursuing his agenda… and, in turn, try to be liked by everyone in America.
Obama was, and seemingly continues to be, incredibly naïve to think
that the capitalist-militarist-racist axis in America would just stand idly
by and listen to his persistent pitch for compromise. And, as
progressives were quick to find… although a vast array of legislation was
passed [contrary to public belief] by this last Democratic congress, in the
two most critical issues – Healthcare and Financial Reform – this congress
was only able to enact watered down versions of what was/is needed.
As it turned out, Obama, too, was de-facto politically guillotined
two years later, but unlike Danton, he was politically decapitated simply
because he lacked political smarts, compounded by capitulating to pressure,
showing a complete lack of courage when trying to defend his presumed
progressive convictions… exhibiting what we might call a total lack of
audacity. Small wonder that many, if not most, progressives are up in
arms, accusing him of venality and leniency to the enemies of Progressive
Change – a GOP totally in the hands of the military-industrial complex and
other special interest groups. [The accusation with Danton had been
venality and leniency to the enemies of the Revolution.] Both lawyers
and politicians, Obama and Danton received the same fate: physical
decapitation for the latter and symbolic decapitation for the first.
Obama really had it made, politically, when he first took the reins of the
nation. There was economic chaos all pointing the blame to
miss-governing by the leadership of the Republican Party in both the White
House and Congress. All Obama had to do, and was so informally advised
by many progressives in the nation, including this humble writer, was to
tell Americans the unvarnished truth, the dire straits the nation was under
and the long haul of pain and suffering that would be needed to come out of
it. And to have that overture played, over and over again, non-stop,
by officials of the Democratic Party, from the district-county level
politicians all the way up to the White House. Instead, Obama
surrounded himself with Republican-lite Clintonians who with their advice
might as well have served as fifth-columnists for the Republican Party.
So Obama, on their advice, promised the unrealistic and gave the American
people high expectations he shouldn’t have… first of all, because they were
idiotically optimistic; second, because doing so is a political taboo in the
short term. You rally the nation by showing determination, character,
conviction and truth; not by articulating a false sense of confidence and
optimism, a spectacle more appropriate to the bulls of Wall Street.
So people were angry as they went to the polls… perhaps, rightly
so; and in their anger they might have put in Congress and state
legislatures scoundrels far even worse than the Tweedledee-Tweedledum
scoundrels that were already there.
Perhaps the saddest note in these elections was played by the
electorate in Wisconsin when perpetrating political magnicide by ousting the
most progressive voice [jointly with Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont] in
American politics: Russ Feingold. Senator Feingold has been the
voice of reason, peace, privacy issues and election campaign reform,
advocating restrictions on both the amount and method of funding federal
political campaigns. He was the only senator (of 100!) to vote in 2001
against George W. Bush’s Patriot Act, which ended up being the self imposed
castration of privacy in America. Ben Tanosborn
www.tanosborn.com
[email protected]
|
|
|